Movements in Omega Seamaster mid-size vs full-size

[Tony Terlecki]

I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.

Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

Many thanks,
Tony Terlecki

[Gary Goodman]

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.
Many thanks,
Tony Terlecki

The movement is the same in each watch. If you look at the full-
size Seamaster you will notice that the date window is the same
distance from the center as in the mid-sized Seamaster. I've
never opened the back of either, but I'll bet that there is a
spacer ring in the full-size version.

I have a mid-size SMP and a titanium chronograph SMP.

Gary

[GT]

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.
Many thanks,
Tony Terlecki

Tony,
Just look for this piece of information on their website. Hereafter the
proof that both have the same movement:

Ref. 2531.80.00
MOVEMENT Caliber: Omega 1120

Ref. 2551.80.00
MOVEMENT Caliber: Omega 1120

[Thore Karlsen]

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

How thick is your wrist? I've heard a lot of people regret buying the
mid size because they thought the full size was too big, and end up with
the full size later. The full size really isn't that big, but you may
just not be used to the size. My wrists aren't big, and it fits me just
right.

[Tony Terlecki]

Post by Thore Karlsen

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

How thick is your wrist? I've heard a lot of people regret buying the
mid size because they thought the full size was too big, and end up with
the full size later. The full size really isn't that big, but you may
just not be used to the size. My wrists aren't big, and it fits me just
right.

My wrist is about 6 1/2". I'll have another look but assistants at
both jewellers I visited also thought it looked too large. The lugs
almost protrude out beyond my wrist.

Cheers,
Tony

[Thore Karlsen]

Post by Tony Terlecki

Post by Thore Karlsen

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

How thick is your wrist? I've heard a lot of people regret buying the
mid size because they thought the full size was too big, and end up with
the full size later. The full size really isn't that big, but you may
just not be used to the size. My wrists aren't big, and it fits me just
right.

My wrist is about 6 1/2". I'll have another look but assistants at
both jewellers I visited also thought it looked too large. The lugs
almost protrude out beyond my wrist.

Hmm.. My wrist was just slightly bigger at 6.75" (it's since grown to 7"
:), but perhaps yours is shaped differently. Mine is pretty flat,
perhaps yours is rounder. But my Seamaster is nowhere near a problem on
my wrist, so I'm wondering just how different it is on yours.

[Jack Denver]

The fashion right now is for very large watches, even larger than a full
sized Seamaster - 44mm, 47mm and more, e.g. Panerai.

So, by those standards, a large Seamaster is not "too big" even for a 6.5"
wrist.

Watches that by historic standards were average sized (e.g. small Seamaster)
are now considered tiny ("boy size") and are not popular in the market
(which affects their resale value) or considered fashionable. They are like
2" wide neckties or narrow lapels. Of course if you wait long enough, the
pendulum of fashion will swing back again, but you might be waiting for a
long time. A watch that is in the range of 38-40mm is I think in something
of a "sweet spot" because in times when large watches are stylish they are
big enough to not appear "too small" and in times when small watches are in
they are small enough to appear not too big.


All this assumes you care about something like fashion. If you are buying
the watch purely for your own pleasure, buy whatever fits you best. The
smaller watch probably will be more comfortable, but to be truthful, the
purchase of an expensive watch has very little to do with your own comfort
and a lot to do with how you want others to perceive you. If comfort is what
you want, a nice light Casio on a soft strap is best.

Post by Tony Terlecki

Post by Thore Karlsen

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

How thick is your wrist? I've heard a lot of people regret buying the
mid size because they thought the full size was too big, and end up with
the full size later. The full size really isn't that big, but you may
just not be used to the size. My wrists aren't big, and it fits me just
right.

My wrist is about 6 1/2". I'll have another look but assistants at
both jewellers I visited also thought it looked too large. The lugs
almost protrude out beyond my wrist.
Cheers,
Tony

[Thore Karlsen]

Post by Tony Terlecki

Post by Thore Karlsen

Post by Tony Terlecki
I really wanted to buy the Seamaster automatic 2531.80 but now, after
having tried it on, I think my wrist is relly too slender to pull it
off. The mid-size model however (2551.80) is just about perfect.
Can anyone tell me whether the movements are different between these
two watches and, in particular, whether the movement in the mid-size
Seamaster is considered in any way inferior? I have been able to find
information about the movement in the full size Seamaster but nothing
about the mid-size.

How thick is your wrist? I've heard a lot of people regret buying the
mid size because they thought the full size was too big, and end up with
the full size later. The full size really isn't that big, but you may
just not be used to the size. My wrists aren't big, and it fits me just
right.

My wrist is about 6 1/2". I'll have another look but assistants at
both jewellers I visited also thought it looked too large. The lugs
almost protrude out beyond my wrist.

Jack also brings up a good point, which is resale. A full size Seamaster
will probably be easier to sell and won't lose as much of its value as a
mid size.